Crude oil prices jumped 3.91% to $123.96 on the United States Oil Fund (USO), even as the industry that produces the underlying commodity keeps shedding workers, a split that is reshaping the oil & gas jobs market from the wellsite up.
| Price | 123.96 USD |
|---|---|
| Day change | +4.66 (+3.91%) |
| 52-week range | 102.42 – 154.08 |
| RSI (14) | 58.48 |
| Volume | 5,952,558 |
A Production Boom That Needs Fewer Hands
USO's 52 week range runs from $102.42 to $154.08, and Friday's move puts the fund roughly in the upper half of that band with an RSI of 58.48, a reading that shows momentum building without yet flashing overbought. That price strength sits awkwardly next to the labor data. U.S. oil and gas extraction employment fell to 114,500 workers in June, the second lowest June on record behind only the pandemic trough of 2021. Output, meanwhile, is running near record highs. The two lines have been diverging for a decade: extraction employment peaked at 187,300 in January 2016, right before the price crash that gutted the sector, and the workforce today sits almost 40% below that mark even as wells across the Permian and Eagle Ford keep setting production records.
This year's monthly path shows the drift plainly: 115,500 in January, a small bump to 116,200 in February, then a slide every month through June. The May to June dip is not unusual on its own, extraction jobs have fallen in that exact window in 7 of the last 11 years, but the year over year floor keeps dropping regardless of seasonal noise. Revisions matter here too. May's initial print of 115,600 was walked back to 115,300 a month later, a reminder that any single month is a rough directional signal rather than a firm data point.
Mergers, Not Barrel Counts, Are Driving the Layoffs
Chevron is cutting up to 9,000 jobs this year, about a fifth of its global headcount, as it absorbs the $53 billion Hess acquisition. The company is chasing $2 billion to $3 billion in merger synergies, and the cuts are the largest in its history. ExxonMobil trimmed 2,000 positions following its own Pioneer Natural Resources deal. BP shed more than 5% of staff plus 3,000 contractors while targeting a similar $2 billion in savings. ConocoPhillips is cutting 20 to 25% of its workforce, and Imperial Oil is eliminating a fifth of its people while closing its Calgary office outright.
None of this tracks cleanly with the price of crude. Oilfield services firms, which employ roughly 627,000 people, more than five times the extraction headcount, have their own separate driver: rig count. Halliburton has cut across at least three divisions this year, with some units down 20 to 40%. SLB has run its own reshuffling. Both companies are exposed almost entirely to drilling activity levels rather than the spot price captured in benchmarks like USO. There is a specific irony in Chevron's case: the company relocated its headquarters from California to Houston in 2024, framing it as a bet on Texas, and some of this year's cuts have landed on that same Houston campus.
The Productivity Math Behind the Job Losses
Output per hour in the extraction sector rose 11.4% in 2023 while labor input barely moved. Total factor productivity swung from a 14.7% decline in 2021 to a 30.2% gain two years later. That is not a workforce working harder, it is a workforce working with fewer people per barrel produced. The ripple effects extend well beyond the wellsite: every upstream job is estimated to support roughly 232,000 supply chain jobs and 421,000 more through indirect spending, a total of more than 850,000 positions tied to an industry that keeps finding ways to need less direct labor.
Texas complicates the national picture. Upstream employment there grew for three straight months into May before reversing hard in June, down 1,500 to 2,000 positions, one of five negative months this year. Yet the state posted 10,409 job listings in May, up 6% from April and more than any other state, with Houston alone accounting for nearly 2,700 listings. Most of that hiring sits in support services rather than extraction itself, the same layer absorbing the deepest cuts elsewhere.

Electricity Is Rewriting the Permian's Labor Demand
Microsoft is in talks with Chevron and Engine No. 1 over a $7 billion gas plant near Pecos, Texas, built to feed an AI data center and wired directly into Chevron's own gas wells rather than the strained Texas grid. A few hundred miles east, OpenAI's Stargate campus in Abilene runs a similar model with its own dedicated gas plant. One data center of this scale can consume 5 to 6 million gallons of water a day, the equivalent of roughly 143,000 barrels in oilfield terms. Basin operators have begun discussing exporting electricity instead of crude, a shift that is already changing local hiring toward electricians, welders and power technicians rather than another frac crew.
Wage Data Shows Where the Cuts Concentrate
| Role | Median Hourly Wage | Approx. Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Geoscientist | $99.50 | $206,000+ |
| Petroleum Engineer | $86.58 | ~$180,000 |
| Wellhead Pumper | $36.62 | ~$76,000 |
| Roustabout | $23.30 | Under $49,000 |
The lowest paid, most entry level positions, roustabouts and similar field hands, are disappearing fastest. Yet half of mining and extraction employers report they cannot find enough electricians and skilled trades workers, even as total headcount contracts. That is not a labor shortage in the aggregate sense, it is a skills mismatch: modern automated wellsites run on sensor networks, remote monitoring and predictive maintenance rather than the training much of the incumbent workforce built over years.
Geothermal and Clean Energy as Landing Spots
A 2024 Department of Energy estimate put the number of workers with transferable drilling and subsurface skills at roughly 300,000, against an actual geothermal workforce of just 8,870, a gap that represents substantial headroom for absorption. The department has committed $171.5 million toward next generation geothermal testing, and a federal advisory panel has called for dedicated training centers to move oil and gas crews over directly. Solar, wind, EV and grid work combined now employ 3.56 million people, more than three times the roughly 1.9 million across oil, gas and coal, and that sector is growing about three times faster than the broader economy.
The catch is geography. Researchers have documented a mismatch between where oil and gas jobs are being lost and where clean energy jobs are being added, and workers rarely relocate even when their skills transfer cleanly. Texas illustrates the point: its clean energy sector employs more than 283,000 people, still only 29% of the state's total energy workforce, and that growth has slowed as policy rollbacks tied to this year's federal budget law put an estimated 830,000 jobs at risk nationwide.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are oil field jobs?
Oil field jobs are the roles directly tied to drilling, completing and operating wells, including roustabouts, wellhead pumpers, drilling contractors and pressure pumping crews. These positions sit within the oilfield services segment, which employs roughly 627,000 people in the United States, more than five times the direct extraction headcount.
What are oil and gas jobs?
Oil and gas jobs span the entire upstream, midstream and services value chain, from geoscientists and petroleum engineers to field technicians, plus the supply chain and spending driven roles that industry estimates suggest support more than 850,000 additional positions nationwide. The category includes both extraction employment, which stood at 114,500 workers in June, and the larger services workforce that supports drilling and production activity.



